Yesterday withdrew Canada, China and the United States did not sign the original treaty, Russia and Japan announce that they would not sign the extension of the Treaty does become Kyoto international climate protection ink on paper? Is the Kyoto treaty will remain the only international solution to climate change?
The Minister of Environment Canada's "Peter Kent" told reporters in Ottawa: "As we said, the Kyoto Protocol for Canada is a thing of the past We use our legal right to withdraw formally from the Kyoto treaty." The announcement of Kent after marathon talks on climate change concluded a few days ago in the coastal city of Durban in South Africa. Thus Canada, which is a major energy producers in the world, the first country to announce its withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol.
And has justified the Canadian Environment Minister his country's decision that "the Kyoto Protocol does not include the two girlfriends as much of the emissions, and China and the United States of America, and is therefore ineffective.
It has become clear now that the" Kyoto Treaty "is not the right way for the solution of an international climate change but an obstacle. "
But the withdrawal of Canada is the only loss of that treaty?
Canada has resulted in the withdrawal from the treaty to direct blow to the Kyoto Protocol, which had already been weakened and expire in December / December 2012. Along with a hint of Canada, Russia and Japan that it would not sign the extension of this Treaty.
Experts said that Canada, with its withdrawal by the end of the year, you will avoid penalties for failing to meet the binding commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
He also added the Minister of Environment Canada's "Kent": Meeting the Kyoto Protocol targets for 2012 would amount to either prevent the functioning of all cars, ambulances and police vehicles of all kinds on the roads of Canada or the closure of the agricultural sector completely and cut heating for all homes, offices, hospitals, factories, and buildings in Canada.
" The Kent at the same time that Canada is making "tremendous progress" towards reducing carbon dioxide by 17 percent by 2020 compared to 2005 levels, a goal is voluntary and signed after the U.S. announcement of a similar commitment. He said that Canada would like to see new agreement contains legally binding commitments for the major countries responsible for emissions.
And all countries have accepted the decision of Canada this sharp criticism, but criticism started from within Canada itself has accused the opposition parties, the Canadian Minister of spreading the environmental spirit of fear among the people .. At the international level, said a spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, "Liu and right" in the interview by saying: "It is unfortunate and contrary to the international community's efforts to withdraw Canada from the Kyoto Protocol at the time made the Durban meeting made significant progress to ensure a second phase of commitment to the Protocol, and expressed hope to play Canada's responsibilities and duties and continue to observe its commitments and adopt a positive and constructive towards participation in international cooperation to respond to climate change.
The Government considered the German tongue and German Environment Minister that the Canadian decision was not surprising, and I have asked the German Green Party to take action against this decision. as expert called party green energy expert "Hans Joseph Fil," a boycott of oil supplies from Canadian form fields extracted from great harm to the environment.
On the other hand described the Japanese Environment Minister, "Joshi Hosono," the Canadian decision Palmasv urged Canada to continue the agreement, saying that the framework Kyoto includes "important elements" that might help in the fight against climate change. He also said an Indian official said that Canada's decision could threaten the loss of any gains made in the Durban meeting. The "Greenpeace" active in the field of environmental protection by describing the Canadian decision "insulting political of the international community. "
And will remain the controversy existed between the countries of the world and among the signatories to the Kyoto treaty and the signatories among themselves between supporters and opponents and will continue to address the problem of climate change in the wind??
Source:
http://theenvironment
Information wonderful
إرسال تعليق